The Patriot Act has a larger purpose than may be imagined.
An incident was brought on his behalf because he had been jailed for so long with no charges filed against him as well as other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It really is believed that this was only done so that the Supreme Court would not hear the case considering that the Bush Administration would have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed that had to do with all the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been charged with lesser much less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. Before he had been set to face trial, Padilla’s attorney attempted to argue that due to the torture he was afflicted by plus the period of time he was detained he had been not mentally competent to stand trial. A judge ruled that he was competent in which he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007).
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to extend it to the 8th of December, giving the energy to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the last day of the Patriot Act since no new legislation had been passed. With this particular extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. When it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted because write my paper of it and Democrats argued against the extension. However, that which was a surprise to many was the proven fact that sixty-five Democrats voted for the extension for the Patriot Act. One in particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, want to see this extension all the way right through to 2013. Lots of the 27 Republicans who voted resistant to the extension, such as for example Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face the best danger of out-of-control prosecutions plus the chance for out-of-control spy networks effect that is taking.
Groups like the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) as well as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform associated with the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will need advantageous asset of the bill and employ with this capacity to trouble innocent people in the communities that are muslim-American. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared ahead of the House subcommittee in the need for reform for the Patriot Act, arguing that the Government tabs on communications with no proof is a violation of this peoples that are american basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion to your Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any investigations that are unlawful the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the charged power regarding the Patriot Act.
for instance, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens seeking to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the United States are being scrutinized beneath the new requirement system associated with the Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) caused it to be clear if you will find any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility chances are they will receive disapproval. More government that is stringent and thorough criminal record checks are only another obstacle created by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also opposed to a lot of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that was placed into location to protect citizens’ privacy. During those times, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, such as the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens using the internet into the privacy of their home feel a discomfort in what they do because their actions are susceptible to review in the event that government suspects they have been participating in anything terrorist related. For online users, it opens the entranceway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also put in the center of the arguments are companies and libraries that are public have to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, at the request of federal law enforcement agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.
I really believe that certain aspects of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not just from Congress, but in addition from the Supreme Court. Congress can be the cause by making certain the laws they pass usually do not go against the protections promised to Americans when you look at the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of this Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to ensure the Constitution is upheld even though it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists that are American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it is today however it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation. The freedom of life, liberty and property has turned into greed. Terrorist acts from the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, money and power scares them more. The individuals vote to own government representation nevertheless the social people have to be more associated with your decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That can simply be done if people get more involved in the political process and not just be happy with what are the results.
The expression “land for the free” can be used too generously. The way it is now, the Patriot Act goes against exactly what this country stands for and deprives all of us of your liberties that are civil. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. If the Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the individuals it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president should not be the factor that is deciding deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving a person such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
The real history of this Patriot Act actually dates back towards the eighteenth century under different laws put in place during war time and energy to protect the US.
The protection of your nation is the highest as well as the most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are meant to be when you look at the interest that is best of this citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. Individuals with this known amount of power sometimes focus on your whole without rational as well as the individual has got to pay the cost. There ought to be a limit in the power regarding the government, if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and search for property come in jeopardy we must consider the rational the government uses when governing this nation. We cannot as a nation just sit back and accept what is being done. To be able to elicit change, we must stand up and do something positive about it.